Roll Call: Serge (Joseph), Mark (Philip), John (Sohars), Myrna (Shara-Leene), Dorothy (Ellora), Joshua M. (Midora), and Joshua K.

(7:38 PM)

KRIS: Now we trust that you are very comfortable.

MARK: Thank you, Kris.

KRIS: And we thank you for your consideration. [To Joshua M.] Now we believe that you had a very interesting comment or observation earlier on.

JOSHUA M.: Yeah, it follows close on the heels of what I'd say was a conversion experience and it had to do with a paper I have to write. I was considering “Consciousness: The Evolution of Consciousness, The Birth of the Ego”, and trying to interpret within that was has been referred to as "the Fall" and original sin, and changing our ideas about that or re-interpreting them along with our evolution in consciousness back toward a collective consciousness.

KRIS: Indeed, you enjoy taking on monumental tasks!

(Laughter)

JOSHUA M.: Thirty pages, Kris!

KRIS: Now is that "thirty" or "dirty"? It is a most interesting exploration and though most would interpret the early beginnings of Genesis in that sense, as speaking about the very beginnings of humankind and consciousness in particular. We would like to remind you and others listening that this particular mythology seeks to remind the reader that there was a previous state before the one that is known. Does that make sense to you?

(Yes)

Now for all intents and purposes, what it speaks about are memories, recollections, bits and pieces of ancient stories concerning a world prior to a great disaster, and that would be a world prior to the last great Ice Age. And because the storytellers only worked from bits and pieces in trying to create a new mythology for themselves and that which they could call their own, they did the best that they could, considering what they had at hand.

And though many scholars like to believe that the ancient Israelis existed in a vacuum, completely isolated from the millions of people around them and from the hundreds of various cultures that intermingled with them, the ancient Israelis were not isolated nor in a vacuum. They were in the midst of -- in the very middle of, if you wish -- at the very hub of one of the ancient world's greatest thoroughfares. Do you follow?

JOSHUA M.: Perfectly, yes.

KRIS: Many times a great portion of the ancient Israelis were captured by surrounding enemies but they were not always the victims as they have made themselves out to be. And being in the midst of the ancient world's busiest thoroughfare, they too were subject to philosophies, influences, teachers, philosophers, religious crusades, and hosts of other elements with which they intermingled on a daily basis. Many who spent a great deal of time in ancient Egypt absorbed some of those religious elements.

Many who were involved with other cultures, Mesopotamia, Babylon, and so on and so forth, the Assyrians and many other cultures, also absorbed many of their philosophies to one degree or another and brought these stories back. And in the very early attempts to homogenize themselves into a distinct people, the roots of these ancient stories can become evident. So to think firstly that the ancient Israelis existed in a world all of their own would be the same as if you think that today they exist in a world all of their own, that they have no neighbors, they are not influenced by the actions of their neighbors, in any way, shape or form. Does that also make sense?

JOSHUA M.: Yes.

KRIS: So the rules of many of the Old Testament's stories are not original. They are fragments of many other tales, told over many hundreds, if not thousands of years, as a means of trying to remember a world that existed before the very last great Ice Age. Because many of the surrounding cultures instilled beliefs in fearsome gods or deities, this also carried forth.

And it would have seemed to these ancient people that if there was in a distant past, a world where the standards of living were far superior, more evolved in many different ways, and now they are laboring so much in an almost inhospitable part of the world, then it must be something someone, or some people, did that merited a punishment of some kind. Does that make sense to you?

JOSHUA M.: Yes.

KRIS: And out of these themes, the mythologies grew and these particular perspectives became foundational to at least three great world religions and dozens, if not hundreds, of other offshoots. Coupled with the area of the ancient world, the hub of commerce and exchange, many other philosophers from other cultures traveled. And we have briefly spoken of this before. For instance, Buddhism is much older than is presently assumed. There have been many other Buddhas before in a very similar line of teachings.

The Gautama Buddha, the "Golden One" is, for the time being, as far back as that history goes, but there have been many others before, and their adepts traveled extensively, setting off small satellite communities in many parts of the ancient world as far away as ancient Egypt, even into Rome, even into Great Britain, or Britannia. So these ideas also had an influence into the basic foundations of the mythologies of the Old Testament.

And many of these writings were interpreted and re-interpreted time and time again to suit the needs of the times, of the cultures, and of the situations. Thus the mythologies flourished, receded [and] returned depending upon the political states. The original idea that there was and must have been a fall from Grace explains however, or tries to deal with, a new experimentation at the level of consciousness.

And of course it would end up in the political soup that existed at that time in that part of the world with so many factions fighting for one thing or another, sometimes simply for the sake of fighting, as something to do other than anything else. And as the ideas get interpreted, re-interpreted, misinterpreted over the centuries and the millennia, more and more distortions seep in.

So at the layer of consciousness itself, you have a poorly interpreted attempt to delve into a different experimentation in consciousness from one that may have existed in the past in your terms. But in other terms still, it is merely a probable line of development from yet OTHER ideas, other projects of consciousness.

This one, in your reality, being a unique experimentation; a petri dish of consciousness, if you like, where individuals attempt to interpret their manifestations of energy from the point of view of a fall from Grace and the erroneous notion of original sin. In truth, there is no such thing as original sin, nor is there such a thing as a fall from Grace, but there is such a thing as DENYING your state of original goodness, and DENYING your state of Grace and seeing everything but. Does that also make sense to you?

JOSHUA M.: Perfect sense, yes.

JOSHUA K.: Kris, why is it almost easier to imagine a state of sin or fall of grace? It's easier to imagine that than a state of....grace...

KRIS: Because you believe in your collective heart that the human being is flawed and tainted. You have not yet changed your collective purpose on that line of development. It does require less energy to accept your own state of grace and original goodness. And these ancient, ancient mythologies found in the Old Testament are food for many other ideas and philosophies and mythologies from neighboring countries and civilizations all occupying the exchanges within that ancient part of the world.

So it merely displays the state of perception of the affairs of consciousness at that period in your so-called historical past. That simply means that this is the experiment that you are still working on, but you are also beginning to collectively realize the experimentation is not only losing interest, it is waning...losing momentum and that you need to get off that treadmill. Do you follow?

JOSHUA M.: I do, and that's what I'm looking at...to get off of that [treadmill]...and even today when myself and many of my brothers will say, "Look, we were created in a state of grace, we were created out of love for life," and when you express that to others, there are many who just don't want to believe that.

KRIS: And that is their perspective at this point in time, but that is their CONSCIOUS perspective, not their inner perspective.

JOSHUA M.: Okay.

KRIS: Their -- you may call it inner Self, inner ego, however you wish to call it -- may hold a completely different perspective. The conscious individual, the one that is focused through the senses, interacting with the manifestations of energy that you call the physical world, may hold a different attitude, and expects through indoctrination that it is best [to] screw the other before the other screws you. Because everyone knows in the physical world that your human heart is most certainly as hard and as cold as stone and that you will be made to pay for it, somehow or other. Do you follow?

JOSHUA M.: Yes.

KRIS: And that is only belief. It is expectation.

MYRNA: Would you say that again please? Our hearts that are cold as stone, we expect to pay for...what?

KRIS: For having a heart that is as cold and hard as stone. That is a collective belief and that is not the truth, but you experience it because it is what you believe. Now there are individuals all over the planet that are beginning to awaken to their own inner truth and realizing that that is not the world, it is indeed the artificial world, the plastic world, perhaps even a world without their Visa card or Master card!

(Chuckling)

But that is not the truth of the world that the individual and the collective are not necessarily the way many of your philosophies teach it. That may put some individuals in a contradictory state. It may put them at odds with their own newly discovered views. But that is also part of the process. It is a collective awakening. Some of you may refer to it as the Shift, but it IS a collective awakening to your original state, free from the chains and shackles and bondage of limiting beliefs about yourself and your reality.

That includes awakening to the realization that you are not created in any way, shape or form -- and that includes not created by a force bigger than or superior to your own -- that would smite you the minute you step out of line, or perhaps turn you into a pillar of salt if you do not listen to its every single command. People are awakening to the realization that such psychotic deities are the product of obsessive minds that seek to control and manipulate the masses.

JOSHUA K.: I tend to believe what you say, that we are in a state of grace and goodness and that's our natural state, but I think there is a general idea that in reality Nature is really very...can be quite cruel. Basically, the animal kingdom, the insect kingdom, everything eats and is being eaten continuously. This world is about survival. It can be really cruel. It keep thinking that human beings detect that maybe there is...that we are not in a state of grace --

KRIS: It is actually not cruelty. These animals need to eat. They do not slaughter hundreds of other animals, stockpiling it as your race does.

JOSHUA K.: But if somebody would bite into me now, I would feel really pain. No matter how much goodness I believe in, there would be pain and there would be blood coming out of my body --

KRIS: Does that constitute cruelty?

JOSHUA K.: Isn't pain a form of cruelty, or a by-product of cruelty?

KRIS: Neither.

JOSHUA K.: What?

KRIS: Neither.

JOSHUA K.: It's not?

JOSHUA M.: I think what you are referring to is a natural evil, not an inherent evil.

JOSHUA K.: Even oxygen now, they are saying that oxygen is not good for you because it is actually destroying your cells.

KRIS: Then indeed, you better stop breathing!

(Laughter)

MYRNA: I'd like to go back to your point about pain. We've labeled pain something, obviously.

KRIS: It is merely a stimulus response. You do not need to feel physical pain to be hurt. There is emotional pain as you understand it and that can also sometimes be even more painful, because the scars of emotional pain can last far longer than any physical pain, correct?

JOSHUA K.: Yes, I agree with that.

MYRNA: The fears that drive us....it's an amazing experiment we've set up here.

KRIS: Indeed! Absolutely. The top shelf of creativity. First prize class!

MYRNA: I can't imagine that any of us are very happy about that!

(Laughter)

KRIS: That is correct! That is why you are beginning to awaken. So there is a mass awakening to your present condition, which is merely the product of conditioning over many thousands of years, being told that you are flawed, tainted, stained, filled with iniquities, and so on and so forth.

MYRNA: I think the key here, Kris, is that we need to change the word "taught" as if there's some agency outside of ourselves. We have set up this experiment --

MARK: A chosen experiment.

MYRNA: Chosen experiment, so --

KRIS: Indeed! That would mean what?

MYRNA: Well, there's no priesthood to blame here.

MARK: We wanted to do this.

KRIS: You have allowed this to occur. For what possible reason?

MYRNA: Damned if I know.

KRIS: But you may surmise.

MARK: It was a big change from the previous experiment, a shift out of that previous experiment --

KRIS: Consider something we said recently....that you basically formulate the parameters of your experiences between two extremes. Do you remember?

JOHN: Absolutely. We create a field between opposing and allowing within which we play.

KRIS: That is correct.

MYRNA: You go to the head of the class!

JOHN: I was already there. (Laughs)

MYRNA: Five stars.

KRIS: Now we would not presume to give him an apple, as we believe that was given to Eve!

(Laughter)

KRIS: However, this experimentation in consciousness is most provocative, evocative, deep, transformative and so many other adjectives all in one. It is an extremely creative venture. And between the extremes of opposing and allowing you manifest so many displays of the beliefs that you can engender within only those two parameters, because you are here to discover how you transform energies.

And that state between the EXTREMES of oppositions and the EXTREMES of allowances gives you much creative, and we may even say decorative freedoms of expression. And you display this through the philosophies that indicate philosophies or mythologies that give you or give yourselves some hints as the various and multiples of experimentations that you play with.

We have heard it said that some say that you are not here to learn anything. We would tend to disagree with the semantics of that word. If you are here to discover HOW you manipulate your creative energies, even within a narrow, confined being of polarities, you will undoubtedly learn something!

Learn and rediscover through your own individual and collective awakening that there are NO deities that can bind you to their words, other than the deities that you invent to bind yourselves to your own words. That means that you are very powerful Beings and you are afraid of that great power because that great power is so permissive it knows no bounds, even when you wish to utilize it to experiment with apparent destructive energies, because you know ultimately that you cannot be destroyed. You may reshuffle the pieces of the puzzle, but in reshuffling it does not mean that the puzzle is destroyed, you simply recreate it, correct?

MYRNA: Would it be appropriate to say that the extremes of opposing and allowing might be the same as powerlessness and powerful?

KRIS: We agree.

MYRNA: In other words, I'm hearing in the story that some of these in the original "Fall" -- I personally don't relate to that -- but this is an experiment of moving from powerlessness to powerful that we've created for ourselves. On my small world, I live that daily to discover my powerfulness, but I look at it historically and the role of those initial stories was, I think, to create in ourselves a sense of powerlessness in order to learn again what it means to be powerful.

KRIS: Indeed. Over the millennia your race has forgotten the ancient meanings of these original stories and mythologies and you have taken them at literal face value. Thus, again, your collective consensus, official reality must in some degree reflect what it is that you believe. Those ancient mythologies could also have been something entirely different.

They could have -- and we even suggest to you to wonder what if your original ancient stories ran something like this: Once upon a time a great people embarked on an adventure, and in order to instill a sense of realism to the experience and the journey they had to pretend that they were bereft of power, bereft of knowledge, feign ignorance, and become subject to influences that appeared to be from outside of themselves, perhaps even from within themselves.

And to further the experimentation they had to believe that they were UTTERLY powerless to do anything but follow the dictates of outside influences and as a result create an entire dimension that followed those dictates up to and until there was a realization that perhaps this was merely a myth.

They were enacting a great cosmic play on a scale so large that they might one day remember that they had done this, remember that they had other lives, and awaken to the realization that they were not powerless, meek, flawed individuals, but that they had instead chosen those roles so they could one day again taste the ambrosia of their own power and gradually awaken to the full faculties of this knowledge and wisdom.

JOHN: I like that story.

JOSHUA K.: So Kris, in your opinion, how can one expedite or quicken the --

KRIS: It most certainly would be expedited if someone had a magic wand and took everybody else's possibility of personally reawakening themselves to that realization away from them.

MARK: Wouldn't it kind of defeat the purpose to stop the play in mid-production and announce the ending?

KRIS: (Forcefully) CORRECT! Therefore it will never happen! It is the singular individual that needs to re-awaken and remember his or her own participation in the play and nothing but that will do. Otherwise, for someone else to come and try to awaken the collective will only perpetuate the old myth: that they are powerless in the face of apparent external powers.

MYRNA: [To Joshua M.] You have a new book to write!

JOSHUA M.: I'm working on it.

(Laughter)

JOSHUA M.: But what happens sometimes, Kris, if you go against the flow, if you awaken, it's often easy to forget and to slip back into the groove where you were and where it --

KRIS: Impossible.

JOSHUA M.: Impossible? Or is that a way of fooling ourselves, or fear or --?

KRIS: If you awaken, you are awakened. You might get snippets and small insights. That is not full awakening.

JOSHUA M.: Right, I understand. There's a lot of habit-breaking that has to --

MYRNA: I'll say.

KRIS: Indeed. We can say that if you think your physical birth was a pure act of aggression, a re-awakening is just as aggressive an act.

MYRNA: Oh, for sure.

KRIS: But once you awaken, you never go back to sleep.

JOSHUA M.: And will the struggle still be there with breaking habits, and tendencies to habits?

KRIS: Indeed not. These will occur before you awaken.

JOSHUA K.: Isn't that what enlightenment is about in its own way?

KRIS: Indeed. It does not mean that now the individual is above it all. On the contrary, a truly enlightened individual may wish to quietly nudge his sleeping friend and say to that friend, "Dear friend, wake up now. You are dreaming. Snap out of it and come to your senses." If friend does not wish to wake up that way, he will not slap him, but simply bless him and go to the next friend. Do you follow?

JOSHUA K.: Yes.

MYRNA: I'm aware as a result of listening to you now for quite awhile...

KRIS: We are glad you do not tire of our humble voice!

MYRNA: Oh, no. Not ever. It's been profound for me. I'm aware of some major shifts in my awarenesses. I am also aware, just as Joshua M. has spoken, that the habits, the fear habits....I was saying to John today, "I'm trying ALL of these processes and tools that you give us, whether it's EFT or other, and on many occasion I'm successful with them. I have a core belief -- and I understand where this comes from now, it's a collective, core belief -- in powerlessness, and there are times, Kris, when I despair of ever letting go of that fundamental belief that I'm not powerful.

KRIS: It could even be said that there is no need for you to let it go.

MARK: Perhaps you're enjoying your performance.

KRIS: That is not necessarily what we mean.

(Group cracks up)

KRIS: The idea is not to lop it off, behead it, or anything of the sort. What does Triple 'A' mean? Acknowledge, address and...

MYRNA: Yeah, accept.

KRIS: Accept. As you are familiar with EFT, the basic set-up, and then, "Even though, in my heart I fear who I am, I deeply and completely accept myself."

MYRNA: Yeah. Oh, wait a minute. Even though I fear who I am, the powerful woman or the powerful Being that I am --

KRIS: Indeed.

MYRNA: Okay, that's good.

KRIS: And the more precise you can be in investigating unique instances and tapping on those unique instances, the better it is. The broader the statement, the more general the statement, the more difficult it is, the more your hand stays Teflon.

MYRNA: It fascinates me, the fear of being that powerful.

KRIS: It is not necessarily about worrying about being powerful, but simply being. That in itself is a powerful statement. The fact that you are is a statement of power because the individual is the power. The individual is the moment and the power. Do you remember? The point of power is now and the individual is that point, is that moment and is that power. Does that make sense to you?

MYRNA: Oh yes, it makes sense. And I remember saying to John, maybe six years ago, when I first read The Power of Now [by Eckart Tolle], and saying "Okay, once we get to the now, what do we do?" (Laughs)

(Group laughter)

Of course getting to the now was almost impossible at that time! But I understand....I just got the purpose of being in the Now and it comes to me every now and again is to feel my power in that, to feel the Earth goddess that I am.

KRIS: Very often some individuals will think, "Perhaps if I do this, I will get to the now, but where is the now? It is slippery, like a greased piglet! It always runs away from me, this now. Where do I find the now, because I have been told that there is some kind of power in the now!? But I cannot find it! Therefore I have no power! Woe is my powerless self!" But the now is not outside you. The now is not a thing that you are not. You ARE that now and that power and you are the one that utilizes it. Does that make sense to you?

MYRNA: Very much.

KRIS: Indeed. NOW, my dear friends, we will take a break and perhaps the more silent, or quiet one will speak with you.

JOHN: Ah!

(Break begins at 8:26. The session resumes at 8:45 with Brahm)

BRAHM: We believe that you have had a very nice rendition earlier on. And the perspective should give you some indication of your own abilities and even raise your expectations to a new level. One of the prerequisites of participating in these great games is a high degree of expectibility. That is why not just any old soul can simply come into your world and be part of the game for the simple reason that this high degree of expectiblilty becomes very fundamental in the building blocks of other realities.

And that is what you are collectively playing with: your building blocks. Just as in your reality your children play with building blocks, whether they are the old-fashioned wood blocks or the new Legos, you are learning to do the same thing at your level with building blocks of consciousness. So you are utilizing parts of consciousness to create and play with as many creative ideas as you can muster up.

And you do this for the express purpose, as Kris has stated, discovering what it is and how much you can do within this sphere of your own influences, meaning the various degrees of opposites and allowances. This puts you into a unique position in some ways. Just as you learn -- yes, there is that word again -- you LEARN how to play with your pods of consciousness, which gives you outcome, so others watch. They watch you in the amphitheatre of your experimentation and they too learn. You did not after all, think that you were alone in this experimentation, now did you?

JOHN & MARK: Nawwww... (Both chuckle)

BRAHM: So just as you may watch someone else and you learn from their actions, from their inferences, at that physical level you learn through modeling, so at that level of consciousness, other beings also observe, learn, and create their own fun, their own games, their own plays. And they do not learn merely by watching you as if you were a soap opera, but they, to some degree, energetically, also participate.

They feel what you feel, and experience what you experience, but indirectly. That is their methods of learning. They might have no interest in participating directly in the same way that you pretend to be lost in your stories of powerlessness, in your pretending to be without power or effectiveness, but they see, and learn, and understand, when YOU play out these roles. They observe the outcome and then they may choose how they will pursue their own path. And your species -- and we're not talking about your human, hominid species -- but your species, do you understand?

JOHN: Our species as Essence?

BRAHM: Yes. Is most respected for your intestinal fortitude, as it were, even though you do not necessarily have intestines at that layer.

(Laughter)

But your energetic fortitude is most respected, simply because you have the guts to go through with those experiences, sometimes to the bitter end. Look at your children. Look how they play. Some will play "sick" and "dead." What do you think they are hoping to learn here? What do you think children are hoping to learn by playing sick or dead?

MARK: That they are loved? That something or someone will come to their assistance, their aid, to heal them?

JOHN: They're learning about being well and alive.

BRAHM: Only partially.

JOHN: They're learning how to follow through on a scenario and see how it works out.

[ELLEN'S NOTE: Interestingly, just as I came to this part of the transcription process, my son passed through the room and asked me what is meant by "character depth." I asked him what it was in reference to. He replied that he had heard a movie critic speak about a particular actor lacking depth of character. I told him that the critic meant that the performance was rather shallow and unconvincing. I said that perhaps that particular actor was not fully immersed into his role, that sometimes an actor needs the perspective of certain life experiences which can allow him to deliver a more believable performance, with depth and sensitivity.]

BRAHM: Yes. They are learning what it is like to experiment with that state. They may have seen old aunts and uncles, grandparents be sick and die and they might like to try and find out what that feels like from their young perspective. Now they do not actually get sick and die, but they get to understand the state from their young perspective. Now you, as a human, hominid species, you play in those roles, but you play them so well you have forgotten them in the moments you can actually snap out of it. You can stand up, run around the room and have fun again. You can paint the walls and peel the (unintelligible word or phrase).

(Laughter)

Or shave the dog! Then go and play dead, and go back and ask for a cookie. Do you understand?

(Yes)

Imagine yourselves in that capacity. You place it and then you can stop. You can get up. You are well, you only play at sick. And at the physical level you learn that you may sometimes derive benefits from playing sick. When you are a child, you do not want to go to school, you play sick. Your mother is worried, she pampers you, gives you extra cookies and ice cream; being sick pays off. It brought you benefits. Next time, perhaps when you play sick again, you will get the same rewards. Do that enough times, the playing sick suddenly becomes sick. It becomes habit. Is that not so?

MYRNA: I'm a little confused, Brahm. If I'm choosing to play that many times in order to get the perspective of being sick, I see it as habit at the physical level, but I see it as choice at a soul level, to experience that experiment and perhaps be done with it. So...is that true?

BRAHM: It is your choice. How often, however, do you enact the choice to not be ill?

MYRNA: (Smiling) I wasn't talking about me personally. (The group laughs) There are two things operating here. One is, at the soul level there's a choice to experience a certain scenario. The other is at the physical level....the habits are the way I manifest that choice, right? So I can look at certain threads in my life and decide, "Oh, I made a certain choice to experience, let's say, lack of abundance," and in that very moment I have a choice to decide, "No, I'm finished with that experiment. I can pop out of it." Is that true?

BRAHM: Yes. You are not a prisoner of your convictions. You hold to the convictions or expectations, they do not imprison you, thus, if someone on stage plays the role of Marie Antoinette and pretends to be beheaded, does the actress actually die? It is make-believe, it is pretending.

And as soon as the curtain is lowered, the actress rises, the crowd compliments, the other performers may even consider her role quite convincing because of the applause, but she knows she is not Marie Antoinette and as soon as the make-up and wig and the big pouffy dress comes off, she is her own self again and she does not go out into the street, look at the people and yell at them, "You just go and eat your cake now! I will be beheaded in a moment." Correct?

MYRNA: Yeah.

BRAHM: Similarly, from the soul's perspective, perhaps once or twice in your terms, maybe all that is needed to understand the experience of illness, but when the ego begins to also understand the power plays and roles and the benefits that can be had, those conscious level abilities can also override the soul or Self desire to no longer pursue and it will keep on repeating the performance. That is what an unconscious habit is, correct?

MYRNA: Yes, I think that's where my despair can come in as I am recognizing the habit, it's the ego playing this again and again and again.

BRAHM: But with your consent.

MYRNA: With my soul's consent?

BRAHM: With YOUR consent.

JOSHUA K.: What's the difference between yours and your soul's consent?

BRAHM: You ARE the soul.

JOHN: Exactly.

BRAHM: It may appear somewhat contradictory but it is not. As soon as you can determine that there are benefits to be derived in other ways, that you may no longer have to go through the usual routines, you may easily dissipate the habit. You have many tools now with which recognize those situations and may even add. For instance, if you are bothered by habitual displays of despair that result in anger, that you can also do something about it before anger raises its head. Your liver is a great processing center. Do you agree?

MYRNA: Yes.

BRAHM: At the physical level, the liver processes toxins from the blood. At the psychological level, that organ represents consciousness' processing abilities and you could say that there are psychological toxins. Old habits for instance. You can affect the outcome. For instance, you could place your right hand on one side of your liver and as best you can, place your left hand on the opposite side. As best as you can be comfortable, and utilizing imagery or anything that actually comes to your mind, you can bring peace, quiet to the liver as well as enhance the energies with which it actually processes both psychological and physical toxins helping to clear away anger. We also believe that you now utilize your EFT?

MYRNA: Yes.

BRAHM: That can also be utilized, tapping on your karate chop point, and then immediately tapping on the side of the liver, clearing up anger issues. Anger is merely fear. Fear of.....?

MYRNA: Oh! Me? (Laughter)

BRAHM: It is, after all, your thing.

MYRNA: Right, it is my thing.

BRAHM: You could say it with a Southern drawl: "It is your thang."

MYRNA: (Chuckling) Uh....fear of....fear of my powerlessness. And that's where my anger does come from.

BRAHM: Indeed. Then, once you have tapped in that area, repeat the tapping, but instead, you can create a different set-up such as, "Even though I do not fully understand the nature of my power, I love and accept it and myself deeply and completely."

MYRNA: Yes. I love that.

BRAHM: And if you catch yourself red-handed in the cookie jar of anger, if at all possible, actually do the tapping whilst you are in the full swing of a tantrum. And then, as you feel it dissipate, switch over to the positive instruction and you will notice just how quickly you become centered again.

MYRNA: Thank you.

BRAHM: Now what is the time?

MARK: 9:09.

BRAHM: Indeed. We will return your Joseph to you and to each of your selves the knowledge that you are far more than anything you have imagined up to now.

ALL: Thank you, Brahm.

(Session ends.)